COLUMBUS — Lawmakers didn't violate the Ohio Constitution or a procedural rule when they passed a law that shifted control of poor-performing school districts, the state argued in a new filing at the Ohio Supreme Court, which is considering a case challenging the law .
The measure puts operational control of such districts in the hands of unelected CEOs hired by state-appointed academic distress commissions, instead of their locally elected school boards. The version of the bill that contained those changes was pushed through the Legislature in one day in 2015 in a flurry that upset teachers unions and public school supporters.
The school board in Youngstown, the first troubled district affected by the legislation, and school employees' unions argue the so-called Youngstown Plan violates the constitution by stripping school boards' authority. They also say lawmakers rushed the changes into legislation about improving schools that was already under consideration, skirting more thorough debate and the "Three Reading Rule" requiring repeated consideration of legislation on different days if a measure has been significantly changed.
In a filing Monday, the state and its Department of Education argued those claims aren't true and that the law should stand.
They said the bill had the same purpose — improving education in failing school districts — throughout the course of the legislative process, was given appropriate consideration, and didn't remove all powers of the affected school boards.
They also urged the state's high court to overrule precedent from a previous case and declare that courts can't review whether a bill complies with the "Three Reading Rule" beyond checking whether legislative journals indicate the House and Senate each considered a measure on three separate days.
"This division of authority is a matter of respect between coordinate branches: just as the legislature must not intrude on the judicial power by supervising the writing of judicial opinions, the courts should not intrude on the legislative power by supervising the writing of the laws," they wrote.
An appeals court previously sided with the state.
Groups representing Ohio school boards, superintendents, teachers and school business officials had joined the Youngstown board in urging the court to consider the case, as did school boards in Lorain and East Cleveland, two other districts affected by the law.
- Lorain unions join teachers for rally against House Bill 70 (VIDEO)
- Lorain, Youngstown and East Cleveland school boards discuss House Bill 70 (VIDEO)
- Ohio mayors talk gas tax, House Bill 70
- Local legislators discuss House Bill 70
- State superintendent says state takeovers of schools need to change
- Academic Distress Commission member calls for CEO resignation, chairman discusses evaluation (UPDATED, VIDEO)
- Lorain school board member Tony Dimacchia among witnesses in House Bill 70 lawsuit
- Sen. Nathan Manning announces bill to help Lorain Schools (UPDATED)
- State Superintendent says House Bill 70 creates "challenging circumstances" (VIDEO)
- State reps move to stop House Bill 70
- Proposal aims to weaken House Bill 70
- County Commissioners Board urges state to leave House Bill 70 (UPDATED)
- Youngstown board files reply in HB70 case; oral arguments next
- Commission chair appointment doesn't sit well with Lorain Schools
- Lorain High School: Teachers won't reapply for jobs (UPDATED, VIDEO)
- Petition aims to get Ritenauer on Academic Distress Commission
- DeWine says he is open to reviewing House Bill 70
- No confidence in CEO Hardy from Lorain teachers
- Lorain Council passes resolution on schools to stop public bickering
- Lorain School Board president seeks House Bill 70 removal
- Lorain Schools CEO declines joint meeting
- East Cleveland school board's lawsuit against state takeover moves forward
- Race again becomes topic at Lorain Schools meeting (VIDEO)
- Lorain Schools CEO: No buildings will close
- Ritenauer picks school administrator for Lorain Academic Distress Commission
- More districts join lawsuit against House Bill 70
- Lorain teachers union files brief in HB 70 lawsuit
- John Monteleone resigns from Lorain Academic Distress Commission
- White House, congressional Democrats see no deal on shutdown
- Year in Review: Tragedies and controversies marked 2018
- Trump signals no end to shutdown: 'You have to have a wall'
- Elyria couple's missing poodle is back home
- No Lorain Schools administrator has received superintendent's license
- Opponents of school takeovers make case in Columbus
- Lorain Parents join HB 70 fray
- Lorain school CEO emphasizes positives in meeting with academic distress commission
- Ohio Supreme Court takes House Bill 70 appeal
- State school board candidates visit Lorain, talk about House Bill 70